riflecredit3

Texas Asbestos Lawsuit History Asbestos lawsuits have led to the bankruptcy of several companies. A mesothelioma attorney can assist you in getting compensation. Doctors and health experts long warned of the dangers of asbestos exposure. Industry leaders have downplayed the dangers. As time passed, asbestos-related illnesses became more common. The Third Case Asbestos-related lawsuits started to gain momentum in 1970s, after studies in science began to connect asbestos with serious diseases such as asbestosis or mesothelioma. Because asbestos-related diseases don't typically manifest until years after exposure, hundreds of thousands of lawsuits were filed. These lawsuits were filed in Texas because of its favorable laws. Johns Manville was the leading producer in the 1940s and 1950s of asbestos products. This case had a significant impact on asbestos litigation. In the 1980s it was discovered that Lewis Brown, the CEO of the company, placed profits above the health and safety of his employees. In his deposition testimony he admitted to being heavily dependent on Dr. Russell Budd, the chief medical advisor to his company. Budd was a doctor who was well-known for his indifference to the health of workers. The evidence proved that Johns Manville knew about the asbestos hazards but took no action to protect its employees. The court declared that the company was accountable for any damages suffered by workers who later develop mesothelioma or other asbestos-related diseases. St. Joseph asbestos attorneys ruled that the company was responsible for damages to the families of deceased workers. After the decision in Borel, many asbestos victims and their families sought compensation from the companies that made use of asbestos as a material. Unfortunately, most of these claims were rejected for various reasons. Some cases were allowed to continue and the courts came up with guidelines for the handling of asbestos-related suits. In the 1990s, asbestos defendants continued to seek legal rulings to limit their liability. For example they wanted to be able to argue that the asbestos materials were not part of their product and thus could not be held responsible for injuries to people who worked with them. The claims were not successful, and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to uphold the “asbestos product” defense. Today, a mesothelioma victim's right to seek compensation from accountable parties in a case is protected under state and federal law. However insurance companies continue defend these claims tooth and nail.